![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() In conversations like these - on whether the system is corrupt - there's little room for common ground, Feldman said. He also repeated accusations that the system is rigged and that voter fraud means election results can't be trusted. "Change has to come from outside our very broken system," Trump told a crowd in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, earlier this week. Much of Trump's candidacy has been predicated on the impression that the political system is broken. Bernie Sanders staged a walkout to protest what they called a "rigged" or broken primary system. During the Democratic National Convention, supporters of Vermont Sen. These confidence issues played out during the primaryelection as well as the general election. That same year, 14.3 percent of Americans said they had great confidence in the executive branch. The study from 2013 also showed a low level of confidence in Congress, with only 6.6 percent of Americans saying they had great confidence in the legislative body. This confidence level isn't at its lowest point in the past 40 years, however - there was an even lower point between 19, during which only 22.6 percent of Americans had a great deal of confidence in social institutions. That number was down from 29.9 percent in surveys taken during the 1970s. A 2013 report from researchers at the University of Chicago found that when asked about 12 institutions - from the Supreme Court, to organized religion, to the medical establishment - only 23.3 percent of Americans reported a "great deal of confidence" in these institutions between 20. Existential questionsĪmericans as a whole have been losing trust in social institutions for decades. "That's much harder for people to forget." 4. "It is, for many women, personal, and then they try to scrutinize the motives of people who are saying, 'Oh, it's nothing,'" Feldman said. "When he opens his mouth and speaks about women the way that he does, I feel the fear and I feel the anxiety from my assault take over, as I'm sure most any sexual assault survivor does," an anonymous author wrote on the parenting blog Scary Mommy. Racism and sexism also hit close to home for many Americans, who then find it difficult to face friends and family who support a candidate they associate with their own experiences of victimization. The breakdown of norms inflames emotions and makes it harder to reconcile across party lines post-election, Feldman said. "That has generally been considered to be unacceptable in public discourse." "One of the potentially disturbing parts of this election is the extent to which - I'll say particularly the Trump campaign - has seemingly made it OK to more directly criticize various minority groups and women," Feldman said. The election has also focused on a number of emotionally charged topics: race, religion, sexism and sexual assault, to name a few. ![]() "What's happening is that the concern we have about our country and the passion we may have for our position has gotten much more emotional than intellectual." 3. "It's personal, and that's what they're modeling," Klapow told Live Science. The candidates' behavior also sets a standard for the public's behavior, said Joshua Klapow, a clinical psychologist at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health. The rhetoric around the election has cast each candidate as illegitimate or unqualified, he said, increasing the public's anxiety. Trump's criticism of Clinton - that she is guilty of criminal behavior and shouldn't have been allowed to run - is "largely unprecedented," Feldman told Live Science.Īt the same time, Feldman said, Trump is a "lightning rod for very strong feelings," due to comments that have antagonized women and minority groups. "Republicans have been very suspicious of Hillary Clinton since she was first lady," said Stanley Feldman, a political scientist at Stony Brook University in New York. Mudslinging candidatesĪgainst this backdrop of distrust and dislike, the 2016 election has served up two incredibly polarizing candidates with extensive public histories. "Today, the sense of partisan identification is all-encompassing and affects behavior in both political and nonpolitical contexts," the researchers concluded. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |